• Login
    View Item 
    •   HSTUL IR
    • Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Science
    • Dept. of Dairy & Poultry Science
    • Masters Thesis
    • View Item
    •   HSTUL IR
    • Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Science
    • Dept. of Dairy & Poultry Science
    • Masters Thesis
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    EFFECT OF CITRIC ACID, ACETIC ACID AND THEIR COMBINATION ON GROWTH AND MEAT YIELD PERFORMANCE OF BROILER CHICKEN

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    MD. MOZAFFAR RAHMAN Registration No. 1605481 Semester: January – June, 2018 (1.126Mb)
    Date
    2018-05
    Author
    RAHMAN, MD. MOZAFFAR
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/873
    Collections
    • Masters Thesis
    Abstract
    A study was conducted to investigate the effects of feeding citric acid and acetic acid on live weight gain, feed consumption, FCR, meat yield traits of commercial broilers. A total of 108 day old broiler chicks (Cobb 500) fed diets T0, T1, T2 and T3 having three replications in each.T0 (Basal diet with no supplemental acid), T1 (Basal diet with 0.75% citric acid), T2 (Basal diet with 0.75% acetic acid) and T3 (Basal diet with 0.75% citric acid and 0.75% acetic acid).The birds were reared in cage management system. Body weight gains, feed conversion ratio (FCR), mortality and meat yield traits were recorded. The collected data were analyzed in CRD by using the SPSS software. Feed intake (g/bird) was almost similar (P>0.05) among the dietary groups. Body weight gain (gm) and FCR were significantly (P<0.05) different among the dietary groups. The highest body weight gain (gm) was (P<0.05) in T1 (1512.37gm), followed by T3 (1496.30gm) and T2 (1470.40gm) and T0 (1325.47gm) respectively. The lowest FCR was found in T1 (1.40) and the highest FCR in T0 (1.52), the intermediate in T2 (1.43) and T3 (1.41) respectively. It was found that there was significant (P<0.05) difference among the dietary groups in case of carcass weight (gm).live weight (gm),thigh weight (gm), breast weight(gm) but there was almost similar(P>0.05) among the dietary groups for heart weight (gm), spleen weight(gm), gizzard weight(gm), head weight(gm) and intestine weight (gm). Carcass weight in T1 (905gm) and live weight T1 (1496.67gm) were significantly (P<0.05) different compared to control T0 (668gm) and T0 (1160.67gm) respectively. No mortality was found among the dietary groups during experimental period.

    Copyright ©  2022 Central Library, HSTU
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Customized by :Interlink Technologies Ltd.
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright ©  2022 Central Library, HSTU
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Customized by :Interlink Technologies Ltd.