Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorProfessor Md. Ruhul Amin
dc.contributor.authorAWAL, MD. SHIHABUL
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-24T08:25:54Z
dc.date.available2022-04-24T08:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2013-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/805
dc.descriptionMilk is very valuable food, readily digested and absorbed. It consists of nutrients, which are needed for proper growth and maintenance of body. Milk and milk products form a significant part of the diet and a substantial amount of our food expenditures goes on milk and other dairy products (El-Loly et al., 2013). Milk is highly susceptible to bacterial contamination due to its excellent nutritional composition and it is easily perishable (Dey and Karim, 2013; OECD, 2005). Furthermore, it can easily be contaminated by many different sources including the udder and body of cows, dust from the air, water supply, and unhygienic conditions during transportation (Hossain et al., 2011; El-Loly et al., 2013). Thus milk and the dairy products can be important sources of food borne pathogens (Oliver et al., 2005) resulting in high health danger eventually causing death of consumers.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study was undertaken to evaluate the UHT milk samples (four brands) available at local markets in Bangladesh. The study was conducted to analyze physiochemical properties of UHT milk together with the determination of adulterants present in it. Results showed that maximum values of protein (3.417%), fat (3.50%) and moisture contents (89.13%) were observed in Farm fresh, Aarong and Farm Fresh, and RD, respectively. Minimum values of protein (3.202%), fat (3.133%) and moisture content (88.64%) were observed in PRAN, RD, and Farm Fresh, respectively. The sample of UHT milk of PRAN showed the highest value for titratable acidity (0.1917%) whereas the sample of RD showed the lowest value (0.1717%). Moreover, the pH for the samples was measured 6.1 to 6.3. The evaluated UHT milk samples were found to have 27.87 to 27.97, 1.027 to 1.0281, 7.742 to 7.865% and 10.88 to 11.36% for CLR (corrected lactometer reading), specific gravity, SNF (Solid not fat) and TS (Total solids), respectively. The clot on boiling and alcohol test for the different UHT milk showed the negative result. The examined UHT milk samples were free from adulterants (except added water) i.e. hydrogen peroxide, rosolic acid, formaldehyde, starch, cane sugar, carbonates, skim milk powder, sodium chloride and pulverized soap. The maximum values of added water in milk samples were observed in RD (3.229%), while minimum in Farm Fresh (1.688%). The statistical analysis showed that Farm Fresh UHT milk was significantly different (p<0.05) from PRAN, RD and Aarong milk samples and found to have more acceptable.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHAJEE MOHAMMOD DANESH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY, DINAJPURen_US
dc.subjectADULTERANTSen_US
dc.subjectSAMPLE AVAILABLEen_US
dc.subjectSpecific gravityen_US
dc.titleEVALUATION OF PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND DETECTION OF ADULTERANTS OF THE UHT MILK SAMPLE AVAILABLE AT LOCAL MARKETS IN BANGLADESHen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record