Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorProf. Dr. Shah Moinur Rahman
dc.contributor.authorAkhi, Sawon priya
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-13T08:41:23Z
dc.date.available2022-04-13T08:41:23Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/78
dc.descriptionRice is usually grown in low land areas under continuous flooded conditions. It is estimated that over 75 percent of the world’s rice is produced using continuous flooding water management practices (Van der Hoek et al., 2001). According to Sharma (1989) the continuous flooding method is very inefficient as about 50–80 percent of the total water input is wasted. Other disadvantages of continuous flooding are: high emissions of methane (Wassmann et al., 2009, FAO, 2010) greater vulnerability to water shortages than other cropping systems (Wassmann, 2010); leaching of soluble nutrients, blocking of soil microbial activities, and reduced mineralization and nutrient release from the soil complexes (Uphoff and Randriamiharisoa, 2002).Water saving is the main issue in maintaining the sustainability of rice production when water resources are becoming scarce (Arif et al., 2012). In Asia, with relatively more suitable growing conditions for rice, production has declined due to increasing water stress (Aggarwal et al., 2000; Tao et al., 2004).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe experiment was conducted at Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur from December 2016 to June 2017. The experiment consisted four water management practices viz. T1= Conventional method (Flooding), T2= Shallow Water Depth (SWD), T3= Aerobic condition (Unsaturated), T4= Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD). The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with five replications. Different water management practices influenced significantly on most of the parameters. Among the water management practices T1 and T4 performed best in plant height, number of tillers, number of effective and ineffective tillers and panicle length, days to panicle initiation, no of grain per panicle, no of filled and unfilled grain per panicle and 1000 grains weight and lowest result was observed from T3. Maximum grain yield was obtained from T1 (7.5 t ha-1 ) and T4 (7.3 t ha-1 ). Maximum biological yield was obtained from T1 (16.7 t ha-1 ) whereas minimum grain yield (5.6 t/ha) was observed in T3. Minimum content of Cd (0.02 mg Kg-1 grain, 0.12 mg Kg-1 straw) and As (0.013 mg Kg-1 grain, 0.25 mg Kg-1 straw) was found in T4 and maximum content of Cd (0.053 mg kg-1 grain, 0.23 mg Kg-1 straw) and As (0.036 mg Kg-1 grain, 0.53 mg Kg-1 straw) was found in T1en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSoil textureen_US
dc.subjectCropen_US
dc.titleEFFECTS OF WATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON ARSENIC AND CADMIUM ACCUMULATION IN RICE PLANTen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record