Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorProfessor Dr. Md. Abu Sayed Mondol
dc.contributor.authorRashid, Md. Mamunur
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T03:41:05Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T03:41:05Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/430
dc.descriptionWomen constitute almost half of the total population of the country. But it is a matter of regret that rural women are economically dependent and vulnerable, educationally backward as well as politically and socially disadvantaged (Sarker and Rahman, 2007). Though, women are playing very important role in both at home and outside but still disparities exist between men and women in education, health, employment and income opportunities, control over assets, personal security and participation in the political process (Hoque and Itohara, 2008).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this study was to categories and describes the profile characteristics of the women beneficiaries, to determine the use of communication sources by the women beneficiaries, and to explore the relationship between the profile characteristics of the women beneficiaries of RDRS with their use of communication sources. Data were collected using interview schedule from a sample of 112 women beneficiaries selected by multistage random sampling procedure from five villages of Rajendrapur union under sadar upazila of Rangpur district during 15 February to 16 March 2012. Use of communication sources by the RDRS women beneficiaries was determined initially on three dimensions viz. attitude, contact and application, and finally the use of communication sources index (UCSI) was computed. The UCSI ranged from 45.24 to 277.68 with a possible range of 0 to 300. Based on UCSI, among the 10 communication sources the first five communication sources were husband (277.68), neighbours (219.05), RDRS- worker (205.95), RDRS group meeting (193.45) and relatives (160.42). The findings revealed that the highest proportion (38.39 percent) of the women beneficiaries had medium use of communication sources compared to 33.93 percent low use and 27.68 percent high use. However, the last five communication sources were RDRS officer (134.82), mobile phone (112.80), television (68.75), inputs dealer (63.99) and SAAOs (45.24). Among the 10 characteristics of the women beneficiaries education, farm size, annual income, daily time use, credit received and participation in IGAs showed positive relationship with their use of communication sources; fatalism of the women beneficiaries showed negative correlation while their age, family size and dependency had no relationship.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHAJEE MOHAMMAD DANESH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY, DINAJPUR.en_US
dc.subjectInformation Relating to Use of Communication Sourcesen_US
dc.subjectFarm size and use of communication sourcesen_US
dc.subjectAttitude towards the selected communication sourcesen_US
dc.titleUSE OF COMMUNICATION SOURCES BY THE WOMEN BENEFICIARIES OF RDRS IN INCOME GENERATING ACTIVITIESen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record