Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDr. Bikash Chandra Sarker
dc.contributor.authorSULTANA, EUREKA
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-21T04:26:28Z
dc.date.available2022-04-21T04:26:28Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/355
dc.descriptionQuality water for irrigated agriculture and its impact on soil properties is an important criteria for the management of crop production. Water quality refers to the characteristics of water supply that will influence its suitability for a specific use i.e. how will the quality meet the needs of the users. During winter season less rainfall and unequal distribution of rainfall affect on crop production. The situation is turning from bad to worse which is common in the North-West and South-West region of Bangladesh. Moreover in some areas there are neither river nor Canals, therefore, the only option left with the farmers _ is groundwater. Groundwater is an important resource throughout the world. Particularly, in tropiCal countries like Bangladesh, where a vast majority of the population depends on it for irrigation, drinking and industrial uses. Groundwater has played a strategic role in the continuous process of agricultural development and also in the development of civilization (Armillas, 1961). Irrigation is the practice in the sub-continent since time immemorial (Annoymous, 1903). It is possible to increase the crop production by proper — irrigation. In addition to relieving the moisture stress, irrigation water plays an important role in controlling soil and air temperature, thereby making more favorable environment for plant growth to facilitate the leaching of excessive soluble salt. This may accumulate in the root zone, to soften tillage pan and to provide crop insurance against short duration drought and also build-up resistance to crop against many pest and diseases.en_US
dc.description.abstractA study was carried out to evaluate the quality of groundwater of 93 tube wells (HTW, STW and DTW) under phulbari upazila in the Dinajpur district. The samples were chemically analyzed and classified on the basis of their comparative suitability for irrigation, drinking and livestock consumption. The chemical analyses included pH, EC, TDS, Ca, Mg, K, Na, Fe, Mn, Cu, PO, and SO,. Water samples were acidic to neutral (pH = 5.32- 7.00) and only 12 samples were found suitable for irrigation. The EC and SAR categorized the water as low to medium salinity (Cl & C2) and low alkalinity hazard with 'excellent' and good in quality combinedly expressed as (CIS1) for 63 samples and (C2S1) for the rest 30 samples. TDS graded the waters as freshwater. SSP indicated that 51 water were good, 30 were permissible, 5 were excellent, 5 were doubtful and the rest 2 were unsuitable. Categorized most of the waters as suitable only four were marginal quality for irrigation. Iron, Cu, status of all waters and PO, and SO, of some waters were not hazardous. Only 24 were found suitable for long-term irrigation based on Mn content. Sixty three samples for Fe and 80 samples for Mn exceeded the acceptable limits for drinking and the rest 30 samples for Fe and 13 samples for Mn were problematic, respectively. All waters were unsuitable for aquaculture, poultry and brewing. Iron content of all waters was unsuitable for aquaculture, brewing and paper and pulp industries. Twenty-seven, 22 and 81 samples were suitable for poultry, air-conditioning and textile. Eighty, 73, 68, 74 and 84 were unsuitable for carbonated beverage, confectionery, ice manufacture, and laundering and sugar industries, respectively. Considering Mn content, 66 waters were unsuitable for carbonated beverage and laundering. Eighty-five 3, 25, 33, 16, 89 and 2 were suitable for air-conditioning brewing confectionery, ice manufacture, tanning, textile as well as paper and pulp, respectively. Sulphate status was graded as suitable for all purposes. None of the waters alone were suitable for aquaculture poultry and some industrial usage. The relationship between different water quality criteria like pH, EC, TDS, SAR, SSP, and Hy were established and the combinations such as pH vs EC, EC vs TDS, EC vs SAR, EC vs H;, TDS vs SAR, TDS vs SSP, and SAR vs SSP show significant positive correlation but the combinations like pH vs TDS, EC vs SSP, TDS vs Hy, SAR vs Hr, and SSP vs Hy exhibited negative correlation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHAJEE MOHAMMAD DANESH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY, DINAJPUR.en_US
dc.subjectWater sampling sites of Phulbari upazila of Dinajpur 22 districten_US
dc.titleASSESSMENT OF SURFACE AND GROUND WATER IN PHULBARI UPAZILA NORTH EAST OF BANGLADESHen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record