Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDr. Mst. Afroza Khatun
dc.contributor.authorISLAM, MD. SHORIFUL
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T07:11:51Z
dc.date.available2022-04-19T07:11:51Z
dc.date.issued2014-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/207
dc.descriptionThe ultimate consumers of the end products of poultry are human beings and the major concern of all industries is the well-being of the mankind. People of today’s world are very much conscious about their health and to the quality of the food items that they consider in daily dishes. As a result, therefore consumer’s demand for the improved quality of all poultry products continues to gather momentum but equally pressing & the requirement to offer products which have received no antibiotics, chemotherapy or growth promoters having detrimental effect on human health. The means of achieving this are to institute: (a) a program of vaccination to produce immunity to all relevant diseases (b) ensure strict biosecurity and (c) utilize the well-documented benefits of administering live beneficial microbes in poultry industry.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe dietary effect of levu cell, a commercial probiotic on the broiler growth, meat yield and economics of production was studied for the period of 35 days. A total of One hundred twenty unsexed day-old commercial broiler chicks (Hubberd classic) were randomly divided into four dietary treatments having 3 replications in each treatment. The number of birds in each treatment was 30 while in each replicate 10. The birds were fed probiotic (levu cell) at dietary levels of To(0g), T:1(0.5g), T2(1.0g) and T3(1.5g) per kg of mixed feed. The body weight gain of different treatment groups ware as T0(1196.28g), T:1(1186.88g), T2(1251.58g) and T3(1273.41g).Feed intake of different groups were 1T0(2388.4g), T:(2446.15g), T2(2484.90g) and T3(2502.80g) and feed conversion ratio of different group were To(1.99), T:(2.06), T2(1.98) and T3(1.96). A little improvement was observed in body weight gain of broiler chicks at 35 days for T2(1251.58g) and T3(1273.41g) groups, although body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion of broilers did not differ significantly (P>0.05) compared to control group. The abdominal fat weight of different group were To(1.11%), T:1(1.14%), T2(1.0%) and Ts (1.0%). The supplementation of probiotic in broiler diets was effective in reducing abdominal fat deposition (P<0.05) but had no significant effect on other meat yield parameters of broilers. The addition of probiotic in the diet of broilers at the levels studied could not aid in economizing broiler production. It was concluded that probiotic could not show beneficial effects on performance of broilers at the level tested but was effective in reducing abdominal fat.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHAJEE MOHAMMAD DANESH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY, DINAJPUR.en_US
dc.subjectBiotechnology behind probioticsen_US
dc.subjectCompetitive exclusionen_US
dc.subjectAntagonistic activityen_US
dc.titleDIETARY INCLUSION OF PROBIOTIC (LEVU CELL) FOR THE PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL BROILERen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record