IMPROVEMENT OF LIVELIHOOD CAPITALS OF THE COMMON INTEREST GROUP FARMERS THROUGH PARTICIPATION IN GOVERNMENT AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION PROGRAMS
Collections
Abstract
The study aimed to explore the improvement of livelihood capitals of the CIG farmers and find
out the relationships between selected characteristics of the CIG farmers and their improvement
of livelihood capitals. Data were collected by using a pre-tested interview schedule from the
farmers of Birganj upazila of Dinajpur district. Data were collected from 131 sample farmers
selected by multistage random sampling procedure from a population of 2202 CIG farmers from
10 August to 21 September 2022. Nine selected characteristics of the CIG farmers are: age,
education, family size, farm size, annual income, training experience, agricultural knowledge,
extension media contact, and organizational participation were considered as the selected
characteristics, where improvement of livelihood capitals of the farmers constituted the focus
issue. Improvement of livelihood capitals of the CIG farmers was measured by a 4-point rating
scale. It was found that the observed score of the improvement of livelihood capital ranged from
16 to 70 while the possible range could be 0 to 75. The mean livelihood improvement score is
54.63 with a standard deviation of 11.37. Among the farmers, 74.0 percent belonged to high
extent of improvement of livelihood capital, while 22.1 percent of them had medium extent of
improvement of livelihood capital, and 3.8 percent had low extent of improvement of livelihood
capital. The variation regarding different assets of livelihood was minimum, the highest status of
livelihood improvement was observed in the case of human capital, and it was the lowest in the
case of natural capital. Four (4) out of nine (9) selected characteristics of the farmers are annual
income, training experience, agricultural knowledge, and extension media contact had significant
positive relationships with their improvement of livelihood capitals. Rests of the characteristics
are age, education, family size; farm size, and organizational participation had no significant
relationship with their livelihood improvement. DAE and other concerned organizations should
take capital-specific agricultural extension programs for the enhancement of the livelihood
capitals for the CIG farmers.
