• Login
    View Item 
    •   HSTUL IR
    • Faculty of Engineering
    • Dept. of Agricultural & Industrial Engineering
    • Masters Thesis
    • View Item
    •   HSTUL IR
    • Faculty of Engineering
    • Dept. of Agricultural & Industrial Engineering
    • Masters Thesis
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    EFFECT OF ALTERNATE WETTING AND DRYING FURROW IRRIGATION ON THE YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF MAIZE

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    GOPAL CHANDRA HALDER Student No.: 1505286 Session: Thesis Semester: July-Dec/2016 (1.268Mb)
    Date
    2017-06
    Author
    HALDER, GOPAL CHANDRA
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1690
    Collections
    • Masters Thesis
    Abstract
    Efficient irrigation method is now essential in the areas where water resources are scare for irrigation. Therefore, a new method of irrigation was used to investigate the effect of alternate furrow irrigation on crop performances, seasonal water use (SWU) and water use efficiency (WUE) of maize at ARS, BARI, Dinajpur. Field experiments were laid out in a randomized complete block design in a spilt plot design with nine treatments replicated thrice. The treatments were accommodated by three irrigation levels viz. I1, I2 and I3: Irrigation water applied to 100%, 80% and 60% field capacity, respectively and three methods (M1, M2 and M3:Alternate wetting and drying furrow irrigation (AWDFI), Fixed wetting and drying furrow irrigation (FWDFI) and Traditional furrow irrigation (TFI), of irrigation respectively). Results showed that AWDFI could maintain approximately similar grain yield compared to TFI with almost 50% reduction in irrigation water when irrigated to 100% FC. The interactive effect of irrigation levels and methods had significant effect on crop growth rate (CGR) in the crop biomass and grain yield among the treatments while the same level of irrigation produced insignificant difference between the alternate furrow irrigation (M1) and traditional furrow irrigation (M3) methods. But significantly better CGR and grain yield compared to the fixed furrow irrigation (M2) method were obtained. AWDFI and TFI produced around 9.5 and 9.9 t/ha when irrigation water was applied to 100% field capacity. AWDFI saved 27, 24 and 19 % SWU compared to TFI when irrigation water was applied to 100, 80 and 60% FC. WUE was substantially improved by AWDFI. WUE was higher around 23, 22 and 19% in AWDFI system than TFI when irrigating with 100, 80 and 60 % FC. However, alternate wetting and drying furrow irrigation is an effective and water-saving irrigation technique which improves water use efficiency without insignificant yield reduction and may have the potential to be used in drought fields where maize production is heavily dependent on irrigation.

    Copyright ©  2022 Central Library, HSTU
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Customized by :Interlink Technologies Ltd.
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright ©  2022 Central Library, HSTU
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Customized by :Interlink Technologies Ltd.